pull down to refresh

That sounds like something an American would say. Your context is more like a jungle! ~lol

In a quick search, I found a few factors:

Social Welfare Systems: Many European countries, especially the Nordic ones (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, etc.), have strong social welfare systems that provide a safety net for citizens, regardless of economic performance.

Life Philosophy and Satisfaction: There’s this idea that many European societies value quality of life more than constant economic growth.

Focus on Sustainable Prosperity: In European countries, there’s a more long-term approach to prosperity and sustainability, rather than quick growth driven by consumption.

Differences in Measuring Well-Being: Studies show that people in different parts of Europe might measure success and well-being differently from Americans.

History of Stability and Political Culture: Many European countries have a long history of political stability and governance, which can lead to greater trust in the system, even if the economic performance isn’t extraordinary.

Less Pressure for Constant Growth: Compared to younger, emerging economies, many European countries have well-established infrastructure and an aging population, so there’s not as much pressure to drive growth at super high rates.

European societies value quality of life more than constant economic growth

This isn't really a meaningful statement. At best, it's probably suggesting that economic growth is being measured poorly.

reply

Should leisure be counted in economic growth statistics?

reply

I would think so, but I don't know if anyone has a great way of properly measuring it.

In the abstract, we're trying to measure the amount of human wants that are being met.

reply