pull down to refresh

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency or CISA is the agency responsible for cybersecurity and infrastructure protection across all levels of the government and coordinates responses. Well with the lapse of appropriations the agency is currently operating at roughly 38% capacity (888 out of 2,341 staff).

What does this mean and where does this put the US? Well to be frank it puts the US in a crappy place to response to cybersecurity events. The US response to some sort of exploit is going to be slower and hindered and that puts the US as a whole behind the 8 ball. Colonial Pipeline wasn't that long ago but this type of event allows something similar to happen again with a slower Federal Government response.

This also affect the government ability to see how security patches work or identify other security vulnerabilities. Under the inital DHS agreement funding would have been extended for CISA to the end of FY 2026 and would have specifically provide $20 million for CISA to hire additional staff to “critical positions" within CISA but all this funding went out the door when Democrats blocked DHS funding in the name of ICE and CBP.

Funny about ICE and CBP is that there funding is now drawing from the OBBB so they are not affected at all at the moment and likely will not be if they are never funded in FY 2026 because of the 75 billion in funding. However, FEMA, CISA, TSA they all suffer for a group that will not at all. While they might score points in the publics eyes they entirely fail in the actual enforcement and operations of the actual agencies.

Yeah, those damn Democrats!

Since taking office in January 2025, the Trump administration has significantly reduced the size and changed the mission of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) as part of a broader federal workforce reduction.

Personnel and Leadership Changes

  • Workforce Reductions: CISA has lost approximately one-third of its workforce (about 1,000 employees) since early 2025 through a combination of layoffs, buyouts, and voluntary departures
  • Executive Purge: Nearly all top officials at CISA, including division leaders and regional directors, have left or were ousted. This includes the Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and several regional heads.
  • Budget Cuts: In May 2025, the administration proposed a 17% budget cut to CISA, targeting over $490 million in funding.

Shift in Agency Mission

  • Election Security: The administration has halted many of CISA's election security activities, ending funding for systems that alert states to election threats. This was driven by the administration’s focus on moving away from monitoring social media for misinformation.
  • Regulatory Rollback: Executive Order 14306 (June 2025) removed requirements for government contractors to submit "machine-readable attestations" of their software security, shifting toward voluntary compliance.
  • AI and Automation: New directives have narrowed CISA’s focus to using AI specifically for automating cybersecurity functions and identifying vulnerabilities, rather than broader research.
  • Resilience Strategy: A March 2025 Executive Order shifted more responsibility for cyber preparedness from the federal level to state and local governments.
reply

Your solution then is to have 38% of the staff work? Seems pretty dumb to leave the agency to 888 people. Plus the funding for CISA didn’t cut the budget by that 17% and provided millions in funding to address critical position openings.

Executive orders don’t override everything. This reauthorized CISA again a with that it will have five programs (Threat Hunting; Vulnerability Management; Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation; Security Programs; and Security Advisors) that won’t change because of an EO. Executive orders do not have all this power you are acting like they do.

I assume you used AI to generate your list because of all the errors in what you listed.

reply

Nuke the filibuster and end the shutdown

reply

I have a love hate relationship with the filibuster because when Republicans were in the minority it saved us from all of the DREAMERS getting citizenship. I do think the threshold could be lowered from 60 to say 55. I don’t see any state for the foreseeable future getting more than 53-55. Make it be all of the majority plus 3 minority

reply

I know what you mean and I have changed my position to nuke the filibuster because it's a senate custom not something stated in article 1 of the Constitution

I also think the filibuster has made senators lazy and complacent

voter ID polls at 80 percent, a clear super majority

Lisa Murk who voted yes on the Dem's anti voter ID bill in 2021 claims to vote no on the save act to preserve and protect federalism, give me a break, that bitch would have been long gone if it wasn't for stupid fucking rank choice voting

reply

It does come up in Last Week Tonight's episode, but with a different framing than yours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-KDUOHEZFk

reply