This whole naka story is such a very complex piece of Bitcoin financialisation engineering to the enth degree
And most new bitcoiners have no idea what has happened, let alone the entire wider no coiner public
This is being covered by Justin Belcher and talked about by those in the know
But I fear this will be missed by the majority of Bitcoin beginners like me, who even after reading still dont really understand the ramifications
It's a controversial take but it reminds me of the very early shenanigans that are emerging from the epstein files, if we can even take them at face value, that prominent financial figures were discussing 'the need for a new currency'
Are we always going to have this financialisation aspect constantly looking at ways to slice the pizza in a million different ways to create a product
It looks to me that there is 50 shades of Bitcoin, ranging from the pure truth of each block right down to the dirty underbelly of finance
And in another 15 years god knows what ways these financiers will find to wrap Bitcoin in to make a buck
I guess just like the infighting is necessary because there is no leader, the tradfi coining will continue, and so it must
Bitcoin is like the savannah, it provides the landscape for the lions to roam, and as always the antelopes get eaten
My only advice to beginners is to be like a crocodile, stack sats in cold blooded fashion and the lions will not see you