pull down to refresh

Dear @Lux

You are frequently posting highly technical BTC/LN adoption content but you have not yourself bothered to attach a LN to your SNs account?

Is this sheer hypocrisy or just negligence?

If you dont have an attached sending wallet and do not manually send a zap via LN then the SNs payment system will tend to send CCs, not sats, much more often because without a sending wallet SNs will automatically prioritise sending CCs.

If however you attach a sending wallet then your use of LN and sats will be maximised automatically and importantly all other SNs users and content consumers will have verification that you have set up to maximise your use of LN and sats.

With you not showing either sending or receiving LN wallet attached it is impossible for others to know if you are maximising your support of the LN or not . . . without you showing both horse and gun they can reasonably assume you are most likely not.

Showing a sending wallet and receiving verifies to all others that you are maximising your use of sats and LN and so maximising your support of LN and SNs sats denominated V4V P2P ethos.

Not showing attached LN wallets shows all others that you are not.

938 sats \ 4 replies \ @Lux OP 3h
you have not yourself bothered to attach a LN to your SNs account

nunya business

reply
1 sat \ 3 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 3h -102 sats

All content consumers have the right to consider the quality and value of content they support by sending sats into the SNs economy.

Where content providers demonstrate blatant hypocrisy content consumers may choose not to support such content providers.

They may even downzap such blatant hypocrits.