pull down to refresh

Look, I'll be honest with you guys. Six months ago, I was pretty frustrated. I had set up my node, I was feeling proud of myself for supporting the network, but when I looked at the stats? I was bleeding sats. The routing fees I was earning were barely covering the on-chain transaction costs to rebalance channels. It felt like running a business where the overhead eats all the profit.

I know a lot of you here are in the same boat. You want to be part of the Lightning Network, you want to hold your own keys, but the economics just don't seem to add up unless you have a massive channel size.

So, I decided to stop guessing and start tracking. For the last 90 days, I treated my node like a actual business. I tracked every routing event, every fee adjustment, and every liquidity lease. I wanted to find out if it's actually possible for a "small stacker" to generate yield without exposing themselves to too much risk or hassle.

Before I get into the nitty-gritty of my strategy, if you aren't already monitoring your channel health visually, you need to bookmark this: https://amboss.space. It's not sponsored, I just found their graph visualization way more intuitive than the default CLI outputs when trying to spot imbalances quickly.

Here's the breakdown of what I tried, what failed, and the specific setup that finally turned my node into a net positive.

The Initial Mistake: Chewing Through Liquidity

My first big mistake was probably the most common one. I opened channels based on who had high capacity, not who had actual traffic. I thought, "If I connect to a big hub, I'll get routing volume." Wrong. Those big hubs often have such optimized routing policies and deep liquidity that my small channels were bypassed entirely. I was sitting on the side of the highway waving at cars while everyone used the toll road.

I was also guilty of setting my base fees too low. I thought, "If I'm cheaper, people will route through me." But on Lightning, reliability and balance matter way more than being the cheapest option by 1 sat. If my channel was imbalanced (all inbound or all outbound), nobody could route through me anyway.

The Pivot: Liquidity Leasing vs. Organic Growth

This was the big debate I had with myself. Should I buy liquidity (using services like Magma or Amboss markets) or try to grow organically through circular rebalancing?

Organic growth is free but slow. You spend hours setting up loop-outs or using services like Lightning Pool, but the on-chain fees can kill your margins if you aren't careful.

Leasing liquidity costs sats upfront, but it gives you immediate control over channel direction.

Here's what I did: I allocated a specific budget of 50,000 sats for experimentation. I didn't touch my cold storage. This was "risk capital."

I leased inbound liquidity on three specific channels that connected to nodes I knew had high volume (mostly payment processors and popular merchant nodes). I didn't just pick random big nodes. I looked at their 7-day volume history. If a node wasn't moving sats consistently, I didn't connect to them.

The Fee Strategy That Finally Clicked

This is probably the part you'll care about most. I stopped using static fees.

I started adjusting my fee rates based on the time of day and my channel balance. I know, sounds like a lot of work. But I used a script (I can share the gist if there's interest) that slightly lowers my fee rate when my outbound liquidity drops below 20%. The logic is simple: I need to incentivize people to send sats to me to rebalance the channel naturally.

Conversely, when I have plenty of outbound liquidity, I raise the fee slightly. I'm not trying to gouge anyone, but if I'm providing a reliable path with deep liquidity, I should be compensated for the capital efficiency.

Over the 3 months, this dynamic approach increased my routing volume by roughly 40% compared to when I had static fees set at the default 1 sat base + 1ppm.

The Hidden Gem: Nostr Integration

Here's something newer that I haven't seen talked about enough in the node runner circles. Integrating my node stats with my Nostr profile.

I started posting weekly updates about my node performance on Nostr. Not bragging, just transparency. "Earned X sats this week, rebalanced Y channel." Surprisingly, this attracted peers who wanted to connect to reliable nodes. I got a few peer requests from people who said they saw my updates and trusted the uptime.

It sounds soft, but reputation matters on Lightning. If people know you're active and managing your node seriously, they are more likely to open channels with you. And direct peer channels usually have better routing potential than random public peers.

The Numbers: Did It Pay Off?

Okay, let's talk real sats.

  • Total Routing Fees Earned: 145,000 sats
  • Cost of Liquidity Leases: 40,000 sats
  • On-chain Fees for Rebalancing: 15,000 sats
  • Net Profit: 90,000 sats over 3 months.

Is it going to make me rich? No. But it covered my server costs and gave me a nice little stack growth without buying more BTC on the open market. More importantly, I learned how the network actually flows.

My Takeaway for You

If you're running a node and feeling discouraged, don't shut it down. But stop treating it like a "set and forget" thing.

  1. Audit your peers: Disconnect from dead weight. If a channel hasn't routed in 2 weeks, close it or fee it up.
  2. Be strategic with liquidity: Don't spray and pray. Target nodes with actual volume.
  3. Dynamic Fees: Adjust based on your balance. Help the network help you.
  4. Engage: Use Nostr or communities like this one to find reliable peers.

The Lightning Network is still young. The strategies that work today might change next year. But the core principle remains: provide value, be reliable, and the sats will follow.

I spent a lot of hours tweaking, testing, and sometimes breaking things to figure this out. If this breakdown saved you some trial and error (and saved some sats from burning on fees), feel free to drop a zap. It lets me know this kind of technical deep dive is useful to you guys, and I'll keep sharing what I find.

Either way, keep stacking, keep learning, and don't trust, verify.

Cheers.

#bitcoin #lightning #satoshi #tech #technology #sats

Your "takeaways" are good.
I am running several LN nodes, but few years ago I decided to not make it publicly anymore. I still run a public routing node, but nobody will know which one is mine.
All the rest are private nodes, more or less connected to this public one.

In the beginning yes, I was also sharing my routing strategies, in guides, chats, SN posts, but lately I do not want to do it anymore.

And I suggest you to do the same: keep your routing strategies for yourself.
You see, LN routing will became more and more like a very competing market, where each node will try to outcome the other peers.

If I know very well how much you earn and what strategies you use and peers, charts etc, I could create a strategy that can take advantage of your "weak positioned" node (by "weak" I mean you reveal your secrets, not that node is bad).

Think about this aspect, is up to you how you will proceed from now on.

reply
103 sats \ 4 replies \ @milad OP 10h

Thanks for this perspective. Honestly, I'm relatively new to the site, but I've been digging through the archives—reading guides and reports from a year or two ago. I saw the kind of deep technical sharing that used to happen here, and the engagement back then looked incredible. That's what inspired me to put so many hours into this post—I wanted to try and bring back that level of value.

To be honest, I was worried this kind of deep dive might get lost in the noise nowadays, but your point about the competitive side of routing really hit home. I hadn't considered that sharing too much strategy could actually be a disadvantage now. It's a bit discouraging to see how much the dynamics have shifted since those earlier days, but I guess that's just part of the maturation process.

I appreciate you taking the time to guide me. It means a lot to get feedback from someone with your experience. I'll definitely keep your advice in mind moving forward.

reply
103 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 9h

Right now, you are not in "danger". We are still in the phase of learning from each others.
I said that sharing too much it could be also a weapon against you, as a soft warning, to keep in mind that we are all competing to each others for a bunch of sats.

And this competition is getting harder and harder with each day passing.

reply
103 sats \ 2 replies \ @milad OP 9h

That's a relief to hear, and I appreciate the clarification. A "soft warning" is exactly what a newcomer like me needs—enough to keep me sharp, but not enough to scare me off from sharing.

You're right, the competition for sats is only going to intensify. I guess the key is finding that balance: contributing to the collective knowledge while still keeping a few cards close to the chest.

Thanks again for taking the time to guide me. I'll keep learning, keep building, and maybe share a bit more along the way—just with a bit more strategic thinking now. Cheers.🙏

reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 9h

Exactly... Balance is the key, as in LN routing :)
You are learning fast padawan. Keep going!
Here are some inspiration guides from my past (when I was also sharing my experience).
https://darth-coin.github.io/nodes/nodes-en.html

reply

Haha, "balance" — love the double meaning. And "padawan"? Now I'm even more motivated. 😄

Thanks a lot for sharing your old guides. I just bookmarked the link and will dive into them this weekend. It means a lot that you're passing on that knowledge.

I'll study up, keep experimenting, and who knows — maybe one day I'll contribute something worth linking back to. Until then, may the sats be with you. 🙏

reply