pull down to refresh

The U.S. Supreme Court just signaled a major objection to Trump’s global tariffs. In a 6-3 vote, they reminded the world that even in the fiat heartland, institutions still matter. Coming from a background where institutions were hollowed out years ago (Venezuela), I can appreciate the weight of this.

But here’s the sober truth: While the Court and the President fight over who controls the trade, Bitcoiners have already opted out of the drama.

On one hand, you have House Democrats weaponizing the Treasury to attack specific bank charters. On the other, you have a Supreme Court trying to hold back the tide of executive overreach. It’s a mess of human discretion.

Bitcoin doesn’t need a 6-3 vote to be fair. It doesn't need a "favorable" Treasury Secretary to function. It just needs the next block. That’s why the 15% difficulty jump is more important than any court ruling today. One is a human opinion; the other is a mathematical law.

51 sats \ 0 replies \ @kruw 3h
That’s why the 15% difficulty jump is more important than any court ruling today

So why didn't you title your post "Bitcoin's mining difficulty jumps 15%" instead of "6-3 Decision: Even the Supreme Court knows Fiat Power needs limits. Bitcoin wins"?

Stop talking, start doing.

reply