pull down to refresh
made the call that administering custodial wallets was not worth the legal heat;
I understand that that was the reason: Not my call to make, not me bearing the potential consequences, so there's not too much I can do but voice my concerns as a user.
(In chess we say, "it's always easier to move someone else's pieces")
reply
do you think there would be too much friction for a closely-affiliated semi-custodial service to be launched by some sufficiently reputed community member, and then the onboarding of new accounts would include it as a default option?
I doubt @k00b would want to do it, given that he's probably the individual decision maker who ultimately made the call that administering custodial wallets was not worth the legal heat; although maybe someone with enough respect for fiat systems, who still cares enough about SN, wants to educate about disintermediation, and already understands how services like CoinOS work...
I wonder whether anyone might actually want to do this; @Solomonsatoshi is probably much happier as a commenter and customer than entrepeneur.