pull down to refresh

This is awesome, but also reminds me of something that (mildly) annoys me when looking at my (or anyone's) history. For posts, I can mouseover and see the breakdown of sats, but for comments, mouseover won't do it, and I have to click, go to the comment in the post, and then mouseover to see the breakdown. Is there a reason for the different behaviors?

reply

It's something I overlooked. I'll write myself a note to add it.

reply

You are now actively censoring my content/posts?
My post
#1441579
Has net 22000 sats boost+zaps over downzaps but has been removed from homepage.
Are you now operating direct censorship or changed the way boosts/up and downzaps work?

reply
103 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 16h

I am not censoring you. That would be rude. You may have missed this update: #1434202

reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 16h -100 sats

No I saw that update where you reduced the leverage of downzaps to provide ~300% advantage to sybil upzaps by content providers...

But that does not explain why my post which has net 22000 positive value is completely removed from homepage where the top post has net less than 8000 positive value.

Sure you would never be rude...

'downzaps no longer have 3x the power of zaps
boost=zaps=downzaps=cost in terms of ranking. h/t butthole'

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 16h -100 sats

No I saw that update where you reduced the leverage of downzaps to provide ~300% advantage to sybil upzaps by content providers...

But that does not explain why my post which has net 22000 positive value is completely removed from homepage where the top post has net less than 8000 positive value.

Sure you would never be rude, or censor content...

'downzaps no longer have 3x the power of zaps
boost=zaps=downzaps=cost in terms of ranking. h/t butthole'

The last X items didn’t get any downzaps. But they still show up.

reply
124 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 24 Feb

Hmmm I wonder what I messed up.

reply

This filter’s gotta be broken… or there are downzaps of like, milli-sats or something!

by === 'downsats' && '"Item"."downMsats" > 0',

Just a guess, it’s probably something else. ahah

reply