Rhetorical nonsense, the boot doesnt care what you identify as.

>That simply means certain evidence can't be introduced in court

that's correct but only a fraction of the story.
They don't have power/authority over a man, only over the person with which the man identifies, or not. If the man knows how to be a man, legally he is free

If you are anonymous on the platform, they legally can't do shit.

That simply means certain evidence can't be introduced in court (courts with compromised judges/prosecutors), but the intelligence doesn't disappear.

"Show me the man i'll show you the crime", if they know the man the legality doesn't matter. They'll use the extra-legal means to find a legal means if deemed necessary.

Politics_And_Law

Zuckerberg’s “Fix” for Child Safety Could End Anonymous Internet Access for All

Scoresby

> If you are anonymous on the platform, they legally can't do shit.

That simply means certain evidence can't be introduced in court (courts with compromised judges/prosecutors), but the intelligence doesn't disappear. 

"Show me the man i'll show you the crime", if they know the man the legality doesn't matter. They'll use the extra-legal means to find a legal means if deemed necessary.