pull down to refresh

archive.today link

This dominance of stablecoins over Bitcoins in its transactions feature may explain why – according Visa Onchain Analytics Dashboard and BitInfoCharts – since the passing of the Genius Act, monthly transactions using stablecoins have risen substantially while those using Bitcoin have decreased by more than 20 per cent.
Even more telling, estimates of the volume of illegal transactions using Bitcoin suggest that a majority (60 to 85 per cent) of such transactions may have migrated to stablecoins. As the acceptance of stablecoins continues to improve, this switch should only solidify. This will leave Bitcoin with only one use: speculation.

Interesting angle from a former central bank Deputy Guvnah. Unfortunately, he's right about people using on-chain (even if he's wrong in his starting premises.)

I wonder if the Govnah and Royal Bank Professor did their homework on the Lightning network.

53 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 11h
estimates of the volume of illegal transactions using Bitcoin suggest that a majority (60 to 85 per cent) of such transactions may have migrated to stablecoins.

If stable coins can do this better than Bitcoin, then, yes, they will kill it. I, however, am inclined to believe that stable coins will feel the jaundiced gaze of the state on this front, and will be compelled to curtail "illegal" transactions.

Bitcoin, on the other hand cannot curtail transactions, because no transactions are illegal.

reply

I'll be honest I'm not sure about how the stable coin works, nor have I thought that much about whether the US or other powerful country could censor transactions. I suspect their opreating companies could fall out of favour just aas easily as they won it.

reply
84 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 10h

There are many ways to make a stable coin. All of them require some amount of centralization. Centralization = a throat to choke. If the US wants to shut down a stablecoin, they can.

reply

Yes but if Bitcoin has almost zero MoE liquidity because most virtue signalling BTC maxis can't even be fucked to attach LN wallets to SNs...and use LN then . . . what?

reply

Can't kill what is already dead!

What is dead may never die

reply

Great framing. Loving the eulogies that crededentialed hacks like these keep coming out with. Majorly entertaining.

reply

The stable in stablecoin means they go to zero with their fiat pegs. Centralized hot potatoes vs 21 million bitcoins for the entirety of human civilization.

reply

'Since July 18, 2025, the day the U.S. Genius Act passed, the market price of Bitcoin has dropped by around 40 per cent. Bitcoin is now under US$70,000. The Genius Act created a legal framework for regulating payment stablecoins, making stablecoins a more reliable and less volatile means of making payments.'

Even self proclaimed 'Bitcoiners' who declare they 'live on the bitcoin standard' cannot be fucked using Bitcoin very much- its too unreliable and inconvenient says @DarthCoin chief BTC Maxi hypocrit.

@DarthCoin much prefers CC shitcoins because 'they always work'.

Now SNs conceals the LN wallet status of these BTC Maxi hypocrits to conceal their blatant hypocrisy.

So much for the revolution. It was drowned in greed, hypocrisy and arsemilking by @DarthCoin sock puppet hypocrits.

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 5h -50 sats

https://stacker.news/items/1441579