pull down to refresh

Even a beginner like me can see it breaks more than it fixes

Reread the comment you replied to shit-for-brains. I am not advocating for BIP 110.

As a self-described beginner I can only assume that you have no frame of reference of what bitcoin was like before and how EASY the IBD was prior to this 2020. You may not understand this but ordinals and the like externalize their costs onto thousands of volunteers running the network.

Spammers would refer to you as a useful idiot. https://stacker.news/items/1443782?commentId=1443799

this data is bad, this data is good? Seriously?

Even your strawman is retarded. What are consensus rule and what do they prevent?

https://youtube.com/shorts/yogBTFNefuE

IBD doesn't need to be easy, it just needs not to be too difficult. This is perhaps too difficult a distinction for you to grasp.

For what reason do we have a fee market?

reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 6h
IBD doesn't need to be easy, it just needs not to be too difficult. This is perhaps too difficult a distinction for you to grasp.

What I can't grasp is how you can consider this anything close to a coherent reply. There's absolutely no rigor. You've drawn a distinction without defining either side of it. Difficult by what measure? Affordability? A 2TB SSD costs roughly $100 which is already beyond comfortable reach for the majority of the world's population. If that's the current hardware requirement for IBD, the threshold has already been crossed by any reasonable standard. The distinction you're gesturing at collapses under the simplest scrutiny.

For what reason do we have a fee market?

Surely it's to legitimize spam. No wait, that's not it. It's to incentivize miners to exert the energy required to confirm a transaction. But spammers perverted the intention behind the segwit discount and now they can flood the chain at a cost that bears no relationship to the burden they impose on node operators who receive nothing and store everything.

reply
123 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 5h
$100 which is already beyond comfortable reach for the majority of the world's population

$100 seems pretty reasonable as a buy in cost to censorship resistant monetary system. Or we can say it as low enough that we'll still have very widespread node adoption (if people actually want to run nodes).

It's to incentivize miners to exert the energy required to confirm a transaction.

Excellent. The reason this works is because any valid transaction can compete in this fee market. I don't believe anyone who dislikes spam has come remotely close to acknowledging the risk posed by flippantly claiming some valid transactions are not real bitcoin transactions.

they can flood the chain at a cost that bears no relationship to the burden they impose on node operators who receive nothing and store everything.

Node runners can only have a selfish incentive. It seems that you think that the incentive to run a node is not worth the effort. I would recommend in this case that you stop using the coin if this is how you see things. Perhaps some other coin is more suited to your needs.

reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 4h -21 sats

same vibes

https://i.redd.it/txxs9czlq5eb1.jpg

2 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taj 1h

See, you just threw ad hominems at me and paid the fee to do it

If comment fees rose a bit, you might get priced out of spamming noise

That's how incentives work pay up or don't

reply