I'm with Anthropic. but I also understand that it is all unstoppable. the problem is not in the technology, it is in humans behavior, always thinking how to kill better. 
we may discover in a bad way, why some people said "AI threat is worse than nuclear threat".

quark

When an AI company feels the need to publicly push back on the Pentagon, that’s not a small governance hiccup — that’s a trust breakdown. The guardrails question is bigger than just one administration.

Ohtis

But Trump’s dispute with Anthropic involves additional, even more complicated stakes. At the root of Anthropic’s claim is the belief that the Trump White House is an unreliable custodian of AI military and surveillance technologies, and that the firm must impose independent guardrails to prevent the Pentagon and other agencies from potential misuse. Does Anthropic have a point?

> But Trump’s dispute with Anthropic involves additional, even more complicated stakes. At the root of Anthropic’s claim is the belief that the Trump White House is an unreliable custodian of AI military and surveillance technologies, and that the firm must impose independent guardrails to prevent the Pentagon and other agencies from potential misuse. Does Anthropic have a point?