pull down to refresh

This is partly the problem with user created markets on predyx. Often the resolution criteria is vague or doesn't make sense.

Take for instance this Bitcoin market from today:

"Resolution Rules: This market will resolve to YES if the close price of the Binance BTC/USDT 1-minute candlestick at exactly 12:00 ET (noon Eastern Time) on March 1, 2026 is higher than $68,000. This market will resolve to NO if the YES condition is not satisfied according to the primary resolution source at or before the exact market close time 2026-03-01T23:59:00.000Z. Only data timestamped at or before market close time counts. If no 1-minute close price exists at exactly 12:00 ET due to downtime, resolves NO. Resolution Sources: Primary: Binance BTC/USDT spot market candlestick data (select 1m timeframe and Candles view)"

Which is it 12et noon or 23:59? and the market ends in 6 hours which I believe would be the UTC close.

This is why I am typically very skeptical of buying shares on user created markets. I’ve been burned and it’s just annoying

reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 2h

There is always a rug risk on those user markets especially when you don't know the creator.

reply

Yeah, they don't want to be on the hook for mistakes like that. There will have to be restrictions on user created markets and payouts.

reply
68 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 4h

User created markets should have a review process where someone at predyx or AI reviews the market for any potential issues before allowing it to post.

reply

That and they should limit the size of markets based on past resolution accuracy or require something like a bond to cover payout mistakes.

I think they’ll end up implementing lots of little things like that.

reply