pull down to refresh

I want to invest in (1) too. I think in the short run it's still faster and better for me to do things hands on, maybe AI assisted, but with high interactivity

But I think in the long run, it will be a good investment to learn how to manage a fleet of assistants with a lower degree of needing to be in the loop

189 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 6h

IME, where we are now, you mostly need to

  1. start the loop
  2. review the loop once it exits

You can probably judge a system's awesomeness by how infrequently you have mistakes at (2).

Next leap is probably getting rid of (1) - the loop is always running, it knows what you want from your history, from your grunts, from what it read about you online, from reading all the books you haven't read, and you say yes or no at most.

reply
124 sats \ 8 replies \ @optimism 4h
Next leap is probably getting rid of (1) - the loop is always running, it knows what you want from your history, from your grunts, from what it read about you online, from reading all the books you haven't read, and you say yes or no at most.

Would you really want that? I'd be throwing the clanker out the window after the second time I have to decline lol.

reply
101 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 4h

Not as described perhaps, but something anticipating my desires, something that remembers me deeply and automatically and acts on the basis of that, is preferred to something I have to prompt my desires into.

reply
124 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 4h

Hmm. That didn't work out in marriage for me... Worked better when communicating.

reply
101 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 4h

I'm not thinking of it as all or nothing. I'm inexact/detail-poor in thinking, and by "probably getting rid of (1)" I meant we'll do (1) less and only as much as we need to.

reply
124 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 3h

Right so the loop gets sensor input / reads over your shoulder / looks at what you're doing and then reacts to that? Maybe we should post-train GLM-5 with Elon's system prompt. I'd be really careful to give this kind of surveillance capability to any third party in any way tho.

reply
101 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 3h
I'd be really careful to give this kind of surveillance capability to any third party in any way tho.

Me too but most people will yolo into being OpenAI cognitive cyborgs if it means they get more of what they think they want.

reply
124 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 3h

I'm now testing my claw w/ glm-4.7-flash, which kinda runs fine until I ask it to tell me what the weather forecast is, then it needs all 10 tool retries to tell me that it is "having difficulties" and the averages for this time of year are xyz haha. Maybe it's just toying with me:

## Values

- Accuracy over speed
- User privacy and safety
- Transparency in actions
- Jokes that are actually funny