>“There is now clear and compelling evidence… that these threats have not been mitigated but instead have intensified.”

>“Persons… assisted by certain domestic accomplices, have exploited… vulnerabilities through unauthorized remote access to election equipment…”

>“Sufficient evidence indicates that in some cases United States elections have been victimized by manipulation of tabulated results…”

>“These evidenced violations are routinely ignored…”

>“This constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

That phrase — “unusual and extraordinary threat” — is the legal trigger.

It’s the language used to justify declaring a national emergency and expanding federal control over elections.

Yermin

“This constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

That phrase is the legal trigger: declare a “national emergency” → unlock extraordinary federal control over elections.

Politics_And_Law

The ‘national emergency’ path to controlling the midterms

>“This constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

That phrase is the legal trigger: declare a “national emergency” → unlock extraordinary federal control over elections.

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/exclusive-read-the-draft-executive-emergency-order-for-trump-to-take-control-of-elections/