pull down to refresh

The original title (too big for the SN title line) is "I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money."

I personally spend $0 on newsletters, and this won't change my mind, but I do appreciate the level of analysis here (including the recognition of his limitations).

184 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 5 Mar

This is cool but 60 days is way too short a time frame to track results.

reply

Yeah, a number of people call this out in the comments. He seems to be very much a quick turnaround trader as opposed to someone looking for long-term stuff, but hopefully he'll try those reports on longer timeframes.

reply

Tracking two here on SN!! Damn the newsletters

reply