From the DOJ-released Epstein investigative files (FBI FD-302 interview summaries).
These documents record what a witness told investigators, not conclusions.
“She previously mentioned she had sexual contact with (current U.S. President) DONALD TRUMP while she was a minor… facilitated through her association with EPSTEIN.”
“introduced to someone with money, money… It was Donald Trump.”
Another interview summary:
“TRUMP mentioned something to the effect of, ‘Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be.’”
“TRUMP unzipped his pants and put [redacted] head ‘down to his penis.’”
“[She] bit the shit out of it.”
“get this little bitch the hell out of here.”
“[She] clarified that when she previously said TRUMP struck her after she bit him on the penis, she provided further details that he ‘pulled [her] hair and punched [her] on the side of [her] head.’”
The FBI form states:
“This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI.”
Not that these aren’t worth looking into, they are, but the later claims should be taken with more skepticism because this had already blown up into a huge story.
It appears to be an authentic DOJ-released FBI 302 recording a witness allegation, not a verified FBI finding.
I don’t doubt that. I’m also past the point of granting any benefit of the doubt the alleged abusers.
I’m just saying that we should expect the older allegations to be more reliable because they won’t have been influenced by the media circus.
a man who completely submits to authority of another man is...
hey, we're just talking about corporations & trademarks & narratives, right?!
#1448727
"i don't think so, buddy..."
Juicy