pull down to refresh
It's a relative standard. Trump ran on putting an end to Russia-Ukraine, rather than funding it endlessly, and made a big deal out of not having started any new conflicts.
reply
Oops... how it started, how it's going
reply
Under Trump though air strikes are a huge thing [..] Clinton
Speaking of Clinton... remember Operation Infinite Reach? The stuff from last summer reminded me of that. Looking at the apparent need for further engagement now, perhaps there is a parallel to be observed, in terms of (negative) efficiency.
I cannot help but wonder: ad cuius bonum?
reply
I mean look who really thought with Trumps track record he was a peace candidate? He literally blew one of Irans most senior and critical generals to pieces. He tripled the strikes in Yemen and Somalia like he wasn’t to peaceful.
What he did and has done is not put or keep boots on the ground. Under Trump though air strikes are a huge thing. I don’t think anyone saw Biden as a peace candidate and Obama ran on “Change” what that was turns out to be reporter en chief. Clinton and Reagan they didn’t run on peace platforms at all.