> he never seems to fathom the possibility...

That's the point of indoctrination

Undisciplined

*if men were angels...*

Also, duuuh, we'd just vote them out? dEmoKRaCY

denlillaapan

I am repeatedly struck by the cognitive dissonance of people like this:

Bullogh seems to be pretty confident that there is a clearly evil group or groups of people that are terrorists.

At the same time Bullough seems to think that there is a group or group of people called governments who should be trusted with vast surveillance and penal power.

Yet he never seems to fathom the possibility of overlap between the two. So much of his argument falls apart if you ask the question:

"What happens if a terrorist is in charge of imposing the rules on everyone else?"

BooksAndArticles

Bullough, Money Laundering, Conclusions, and Stupid Costs: A Follow-Up

I am repeatedly struck by the cognitive dissonance of people like this: 

Bullogh seems to be pretty confident that there is a clearly evil group or groups of people that are terrorists.

At the same time Bullough seems to think that there is a group or group of people called governments who should be trusted with vast surveillance and penal power. 

Yet he never seems to fathom the possibility of overlap between the two. So much of his argument falls apart if you ask the question:

"What happens if a terrorist is in charge of imposing the rules on everyone else?"