pull down to refresh

They have their own shitcoin and blockchain? Why not a custodial LN?

the square thing is a different payy i think?

our work has nothing to do with square. we forked a payments network (called payy) because we liked the user experience and transaction logic. at the time we forked it, it only did stablecoin payments. idk if they're doing their own token or whatever

to be clear, our company isn't doing a token. we're launching our own network as an experiment to get people's feedback on payments with zero-knowledge proofs. we won't bullshit on assumptions, etc. it's only going to support bitcoin-denominated payments

reply

are you saying you are going to add this privacy layer to bitcoin transactions?

reply

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you all were working on this, I just thought your explanation of what square was doing had some cool details.

reply

that’s why I asked

reply