I don't have to demonstrate that fees can be wielded to mitigate imbalance...
You have evidence to the contrary. Yours will stay an ungrounded theory until then. 👍
Its already possible to periodically adjust your asymmetric fees in ways that approximate a symmetric or convex fee function, and you can observe many nodes which seem to be doing this already in mainnet.
Your understanding of convex fees is mistaken. It would require a new network primitive.
Symmetric fees, like coordinated replenishment, would also require greater-than-local participation to be effective for symmetrically cheap payment paths to emerge. i.e. you can't just adjust your fees, others would have to participate. You're welcome to implement that. It would give you an opportunity to gain some empathy/understanding of the problem at hand.
You have evidence to the contrary. Yours will stay an ungrounded theory until then. 👍
Your understanding of convex fees is mistaken. It would require a new network primitive.
Symmetric fees, like coordinated replenishment, would also require greater-than-local participation to be effective for symmetrically cheap payment paths to emerge. i.e. you can't just adjust your fees, others would have to participate. You're welcome to implement that. It would give you an opportunity to gain some empathy/understanding of the problem at hand.