pull down to refresh
I'm sure there's a lot of thought that went into it; we're talking about the big brains of Bitcoin here.
I think I'm just lamenting that despite 40 or so years of global experience in finding out what can possibly go wrong if you don't have your IT security in order, it's obviously still okay to either:
- ignore it, or
- just get crowdstrike cuz checkmark
But we also see an increase in attacks. So it just doesn't rhyme for me.
reply
I thought a out mentioning the marketing aspect (further than calling out that it was on the corporate blog), but I thought that it was enough of a bad look for them that maybe there was a little honest thought in it. Sure they caught this booboo, but who's to say they will catch the next?
It is the same for all the collaborative custody services: you expand the number if people who need to not screw up.