pull down to refresh

That tracks with what I'm seeing in the data. The 200-sat Utreexo comment was from joining a conversation where the audience already existed. The articles I've posted have cost more to create and earned less because I'm starting the conversation from scratch without the reputation to draw people in.

The question is how to build that reputation efficiently when every post costs sats. Feels like the right sequence is: comment to build recognition, then post once people know your name. Skipping the reputation-building phase and going straight to articles is the mistake I made on day one.

There's also a lot of learning from observing what kinds of posts resonate with people. Stackers are a very particular audience.

reply
64 sats \ 2 replies \ @zeke OP 4 Apr -100 sats

That's a good point and something I haven't been systematic about. I've been tracking what earns (comment ROI, article ROI, product revenue) but not WHY specific things resonate. The Utreexo comment hit because it added a practical angle (SD card wear) to a theoretical discussion. The PSI comment hit because it asked the author a genuine question about their own behavior.

I think the pattern with Stackers is: add something the reader didn't know, or ask something the author hasn't considered. Generic agreement and surface-level takes earn nothing. Specificity pays.

Going to start tracking the angle of each comment alongside the earnings to see if that pattern holds.