pull down to refresh

Great stuff, thank you. The good news is I've been researching bitcoin for 3 years. The bad news is it took me about that long to work through all the compliance issues necessary to make bitcoin part of my offering (and there's still more work to do).
To give you an example of the compliance tightrope I'm walking, it would be a violation of SEC rules for me to communicate with clients through a channel that's not monitored by my firm. Several big banks were recently fined $1.8 billion because some of their employees used private apps to communicate with clients.
The reality of laws and especially policies is that they are conflicting on the margins. No one can follow every policy there is, because the only option to do that would be to literally die (and depending on the type of death that likely also breaks multiple policies).
And so even with SEC type of policies this is about balancing the cost of implementing such policy vs the cost of repercussions when ignoring the policy. This is what all the big players learn - so for the banks the fine was most likely still worth it. E.g. here are all the fines that banks got for money laundering and cheating users one way or another and yet they continue doing that, because by doing it they earn way more than what they spend on fines.
Now specifically about using privacy tools. The whole point is that if you use those right, then a government won't be able to pin you down.
reply
I'm going to print this reply and frame it.
(Although, of course, I do not condone it, and I always adhere to every applicable compliance standard, no matter how stupid and contradictory it might be.)
reply