pull down to refresh

441 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 11 Apr \ parent \ on: What year does avoiding a soft fork become riskier than implementing one? bitcoin AskSN lightning

Here are all the posts about quantum computing since April 1 (with a few unrelated quantum posts weeded out):

  • Kardashev scale Quantum Computing for Bitcoin Mining (#1468768)
  • The Last Line of Defense: Can QSB Save Bitcoin from the Quantum Storm?(#1469226)
  • Horizon Quantum To Acquire IonQ 256-Qubit Trapped-Ion System (#1469014)
  • Quantum safe bitcoin transactions with no fork. (#1468187)
  • Cryptographers place $5,000 bet whether quantum will matter (#1467927)
  • pqc-precommitment-migration: Bitcoin script-path spending via existing tapscript (#1468696)
  • Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge (#1467592)
  • Bitcoin: quantum attack on mining would require the energy of a star (#1467402)
  • nvk Is Mostly Right. That's Exactly Why We Build BIP 360. (#1467215)
  • Isogenies, SHRIMPS, payjoin, GSR - Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #399 Recap Podcast (#1467025)
  • Even more people talking about quantum computers and Bitcoin today (#1466637)
  • New Advances Bring the Era of Quantum Computers Closer Than Ever | QM (#1464586)
  • Google Just Moved Q-Day to 2029. Here's What That Means for Your Bitcoin. (#1464532)
  • Thread about the recent CalTech quantum computing paper (#1464330)
  • Post Quantum Cryptography - Computerphile (#1464042)
  • Does BIP 360 (quantum upgrade) also fix bitcoin's security budget? (#1463883)
  • Factoring is not a good benchmark to track Q-day (#1464313)
  • Quantum computing bombshells that are not April Fools - Scott Aaronson (#1463651)
  • A 200-year-old light trick just transformed quantum encryption (#1463564)
  • Is "Go write a BIP" bad advice? (#1463426)
write
compose
4 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 12 Apr

Hey thanks for posting this list. It reminded me I had to respond to a bot hallucination too, haha.

reply