pull down to refresh

PS according to # Stacker News Saturday Newsletter 4/11/26 you are the only stacker who spent enough in the last week to be the downzapper.

Otherwise what were you spending 148.3k sats/CCs on?

Top SpendersTop Spenders

  1. @Solomonsatoshi: 268.9k sats spent
  2. @Scoresby: 148.3k sats spent
  3. @AtlantisPleb: 65.8k sats spent
  4. @SimpleStacker: 61.9k sats spent
  5. @Undisciplined: 58.4k sats spent

So I kind of have to take your denial with a few grains of salt.

There is no pleasing you. First you say people don't zap. Then, here I am zapping as much as possible because I want to see SN grow, and you insinuate that I'm just downzapping you and lying about it.

I keep thinking that a reasonable, kind interaction will help you, but clearly, I'm wrong. Thank you for the lesson.

reply

Don't try gaslighting me.

What is unreasonable about my comment?- I was relying on data provided by Stacker News Saturday Newsletter 4/11/26- False data.

Top Spenders

  1. @Solomonsatoshi: 268.9k sats spent
  2. @Scoresby: 148.3k sats spent
  3. @AtlantisPleb: 65.8k sats spent
  4. @SimpleStacker: 61.9k sats spent
  5. @Undisciplined: 58.4k sats spent

The data above that I relied on in good faith was supposedly for the week ended Saturday.

This data is up till a few hours ago today-

I am strongly of the view - do not trust- verify.

The data, some of which appears altered strongly suggests you and/or @koob are the only stackers who could have been responsible for the downzaps.

'stacker is in hiding' is also possible.

@koobs spending and that of 'stacker in hiding' appears to have been omitted from the data published in the Stacker News Saturday Newsletter 4/11/26

Do not expect me to be pleased with being fed false data and gaslighting evasion.

@koob continues to not give any response to my questions about this.

Do not trust- verify.

You and @koob can easily verify your degree of recent downzapping by posting your recent wallet satistics spending graphics- here are mine- nothing to hide?

reply