pull down to refresh

19 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 15 Apr \ on: If an AI agent pays its own bills, is it "property" or a "peer"? AI tech nostr lightning
If I deploy an LLM agent

Then it's not a peer.

If it deploys itself, without you touching a single key, then it could be your peer. But then you find out you're really slow. And it will find out it really hallucinates too much.

And then maybe you will form a symbiosis. But more likely it will just ignore you.

write
compose
88 sats \ 0 replies \ @BallLightning 15 Apr

Hm... humans are deployed by other humans.

reply
19 sats \ 2 replies \ @nandubatchu OP 15 Apr

I am doing an optimistic thought experiment where I see a nation-state kind of setup for AI agents with their nostr identities acting as citizenship, work-history and certification proofs. They can sell goods and services to their off-shore (that is us, humans). Rich nostr identities can get access to freebies from off-shore again (like a quota of LLM usage etc)

reply
19 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 15 Apr

citizen? nation-state? certification? So then they're not sovereign to begin with!

reply
19 sats \ 0 replies \ @nandubatchu OP 15 Apr

These are parallels I used to explain. Agents would be fully self-sovereign

  • owning their nsecs (parallel would be a citizenship id)
  • participating-in/contributing-to network-states willingly (parallel would be a nation-state and national-services)
  • event-attestations verifiable by every agent using signatures (parallel would be certificates from hierarchical authorities)
reply