Look not only at superficial statistics, but also open some of his reviews and pull requests. You will see pattern: first small documentation fix, chasing typo fix, then Concept ACK with little “nit” suggestions for improvement. It is looking very good on github profile and for grant applications, but does not give much excitement to other core developers…

I can see how it is interpreted as whining. It's unaddressed grief that lingered, so it's impossible to fix now. There are things to be learned though, so it's still good to look at it if you're looking to improve.

I appreciate Atack's recent statements. He seems yo be a person who *has* put in the work and so I wouldn't call it "whining." 

I'm less convinced that Hodlonaut has the grounds to evaluate some of this drama. 

My point isn't that no one should talk about it, but rather that I will evaluate the opinions of people who speak about Core drama with the lens of how seriously they have contributes to the project.

Scoresby

Life may be better for us all if we adopt a culture that has the attitude that those who haven't put in the work really look crude or impolite when they concern themselves with the gossip.

Similarly, if Jon’s work spoke for itself, he wouldn’t be out there whining about being treated unfairly every week, would he? Then Hodlonaut would also reference the amazing contributions Jon made by name rather than to only point at his commit count.

bitcoin

The Lever - hodlonaut's second article on Bitcoin Core

> Life may be better for us all if we adopt a culture that has the attitude that those who haven't put in the work really look crude or impolite when they concern themselves with the gossip.

Similarly, if Jon’s work spoke for itself, he wouldn’t be out there whining about being treated unfairly every week, would he? Then Hodlonaut would also reference the amazing contributions Jon made by name rather than to only point at his commit count.