It's like that quip: I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you!
Writing is an important way and process of sharpening your thinking. So for the author they're skipping the whole step of becoming an expert on subject matter.
For the audience the question depends on the point of reading. I recently heard a very fine speech given at a conference that had a heavy AI feel, but appreciated it being better than so many shitty possibilities. It was like yeah nice rhetoric and way to keep it compact! We all know such a speech is a formality so why not get a good quality product out to the people. I would feel the opposite if I wanted a unique personal take from like a celebrity.
This all really plays with expectations and perception of value. I think the trademarks of AI will fade but our perception of what a given author had to do with their output will continue to grow as a question.
It's like that quip: I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you!
Writing is an important way and process of sharpening your thinking. So for the author they're skipping the whole step of becoming an expert on subject matter.
For the audience the question depends on the point of reading. I recently heard a very fine speech given at a conference that had a heavy AI feel, but appreciated it being better than so many shitty possibilities. It was like yeah nice rhetoric and way to keep it compact! We all know such a speech is a formality so why not get a good quality product out to the people. I would feel the opposite if I wanted a unique personal take from like a celebrity.
This all really plays with expectations and perception of value. I think the trademarks of AI will fade but our perception of what a given author had to do with their output will continue to grow as a question.