To me it's cool to question them and question inconsistencies.  I just think the tone matters, and also the whole "oh we just have to trick them around it" attitude is pretty smarmy.

The general vibe amongst our peers is definitely that repugnance is dumb and anachronistic. 

I’m probably somewhere between you and the median on that. I do think we should be more open to reexamining cultural taboos but also less arrogantly dismissive of them.

Undisciplined

Because imo the more economists dismiss moral concerns as something illegitimate to be dismissed, or more charitably, "navigated around", or "reframed" as the article suggests, the more annoyed I get with them.