The link is a short summary of Richman's study of the diamond district masquerading as a review of Uncut Gems.
I haven't read Rickman's paper or book, Stateless Commerce, yet, but I wanted to share as reminder and I think stackers will find it interesting (if my own interest is any indication).
Forty-seventh Street is, in fact, a thick network of middlemen, with diamantaires buying and selling large caches of diamonds much like stock brokers buy and sell at the New York Stock Exchange. And since diamonds are so expensive — a pocketful of diamonds easily exceeds hundreds of thousands of dollars in value — diamantaires rarely have sufficient liquid assets to pay for stones in cash. So they rely on purchasing stones on credit.
But a credit sale exposes a diamond seller to an enormous financial risk. Because diamonds are portable, universally valuable and virtually untraceable, a would-be purchaser on credit could easily abscond with a cache of diamonds. Even if a thief skipped town, leaving assets behind that a jilted seller could recover, those assets would pale in value to lost diamonds.
The true genius of the Diamond District, I discovered, is a reputation mechanism that rewards honest behavior and shuns merchants with a blemished record.
There are two pillars that hold people accountable.
First, the industry imposes economic sanctions on those who fail to uphold their financial obligations. A trade association publicizes to the entire industry the identities of anyone reported to have cheated, misallocated funds or exhibited any disreputable conduct. The formal mechanism is a bulletin board that — much like the “Wanted” posters in the Old West — displays pictures of individuals who haven’t paid their debts. Those whose faces appear on the wall are known to be in default and are shunned by the industry. Those who remain off the board and maintain an unblemished reputation are guaranteed a lifetime of lucrative business.
Second, families and communities police their own. Family businesses form the backbone of the industry, and reputations are bequeathed and inherited. Those who break the code of trust bring harm not only to their own reputation but also that of their family. The reputational stakes are high, since many plan to bequeath their lucrative businesses to their children. They’re also sources of employment for extended family and ethnic compatriots. Since families and communities have so much to gain by everyone behaving honorably, they bring shame and impose penalties to any of their own who cheat in the business.
My curiosity is to what extent their practices have been digitized.
Because if they haven't been, and they're too slow in embracing technology, then my guess is this old way of doing business will gradually lose market share and become irrelevant, despite the relative genius of its handling of certain market frictions.
I bet you are correct, but i think the best chance they have to keep their economic moat for as long as possiblr is to stay as far away from the internet as possible.
Honestly one of the best real-world examples of how reputation can work better than regulation. In the Diamond District, trust and community accountability became the security layer long before Bitcoin made “don’t trust, verify” popular.