pull down to refresh
True. If his lazy ass would write more, I wouldn't have to work so much and he'd have a more stable income.
I'm very unclear as to how this would work out for you -.-
You work hard and I get 21%. It's a more generous offer than you'll get from your beloved Norway.
...but all I "get," (I guess my revenue?) is mostly from, like, six stackers -- of whom you're one.
But OK, I see how that's "passive." (Not sure sure it's income; first, territory rent; second, deteriorating and debasing bitcoin value)
Ah, so you think it might be a problem for my business model if I'm the one both paying and taxing you?
Also, obviously I own ~econ, because renting is for lazy communists.
yes.
And owning seems like a bad choice now, in case you purchased with overvalued sats -.- I understand you need to whip your "workers"
Well, it felt like buying low at the time. That counts for something, right?
I imagine that's what Bailey tells himself, too
Who cares about net profit, let's just cite total flows and make this look like a vital and dynamic economic activity: #1515506
My lazy ass too
Mine too, obviously
There's already a market between you