Sorry, I thought I was asking @gregtonoski . I’m new on this site.

Why do you keep asking the same question of me but in different places? Are you expecting a different answer?
https://stacker.news/items/1515984/r/cryptoquick?commentId=1516052

cryptoquick

BIP-110 claims it can reduce the amount of arbitrary data on chain, but even napkin math shows that it, at best, gives a 0.6% increase in cost/byte for a spammer. It also does not prevent embedding contiguous image files even in policy standard Knots txs. Given its technical ineffectiveness, the remaining goal of "sending a message" is mere virtue signaling, no better than planting a sign on your lawn saying "outdoor air pollution is not welcome here!" What remaining reasons are there for supporting this?

Hunter Beast - Dev, Rust, Bitcoin

Maybe you can answer, then:

BIP-110 claims it can reduce the amount of arbitrary data on chain, but even napkin math shows that it, at best, gives a 0.6% increase in cost/byte for a spammer. It also does not prevent embedding contiguous image files even in policy standard Knots txs. Given its technical ineffectiveness, the remaining goal of "sending a message" is mere virtue signaling, no better than planting a sign on your lawn saying "outdoor air pollution is not welcome here!" What remaining reasons are there for supporting this?