I think these are strawman arguments. Do I have the meaning of that right? Sometimes I say something and it means something else, forgive me if I'm doing that here. 

But my point is that there have been multiple good faith attempts to tackle the issue of UTXO bloat. This is a problem that I see there is consensus on.

Consensus for BIP110 is building.

MatthewD

That is your opinion. What will you do when a group of bitcoin users decide that your utxos are bloat and causing harm?

Anyone who competes with me for blockspace causes me harm. Anyone who makes a transaction of any kind adds bytes to my node's drive.

You think this is clear cut. I think there will come a time when people say it is clear cut that certain monetary transactions are harmful.

Hunter Beast - Dev, Rust, Bitcoin

cryptoquick

That is your opinion. What will you do when a group of bitcoin users decide that your utxos are bloat and causing harm?

Anyone who competes with me for blockspace causes me harm. Anyone who makes a transaction of any kind adds bytes to my node's drive. 

You think this is clear cut. I think there will come a time when people say it is clear cut that certain monetary transactions are harmful. 

How do you not see where this leads?