pull down to refresh

But what if the state sets off a global EMP? Good luck with your bitcoin then, dork!

It's rather ironic for someone at the Mises Institute to be flirting with the Nirvana Fallacy. No, bitcoin isn't a magic bullet that instantly solves every problem related to state aggression. It is still relevant that it's harder to separate a person from their bitcoin than any other money in existence and also more difficult to stop them from transacting with it.

Yes, I originally clicked on the article link hoping for a bit more of a reasoned argument or evidence or something. His evidence was mostly that the state hasn't disappeared yet.

reply

That said, it would be nice to solve the problem of the state cutting an entire country's internet.

reply

Kinda solved by that little space business that IPO'd the other day.

reply

Why wasn't it? Or, were there people with StarLink in Iran during the blackout?

reply

I'm quite sure that there's a US export ban on that kind of stuff to Iran. So that's a poor example. Pick any place that isn't on a US sanctions list and this will work.

reply

That makes it a great example of this problem, actually.

reply

Why? Because a bunch of oppressive overlords on the other side of the world hate your local oppressive overlord so they choose to punish you, the real victim? Meh. I think that just shows that no one gives 2 fucks about anyone and you're on your own.

reply

cool formula.

Bitcoin gets used by 1% of the population, entirely and properly by maybe 0.1%. State immediately withers away.

eeeeh, what.

reply