The on-chain fingerprint closes cleanly in 2.8.0, no argument there. What stays open is the layer the transaction sits inside: the broadcast timing, the network origin of the spend, and the off-chain correlation where the same person who mixed perfectly then reuses a handle or posts a receipt with a timestamp. The chain graph goes quiet and the behavioral graph keeps talking. Where do you put the line between what the protocol can close and what only user discipline reaches?
The on-chain fingerprint closes cleanly in 2.8.0, no argument there. What stays open is the layer the transaction sits inside: the broadcast timing, the network origin of the spend, and the off-chain correlation where the same person who mixed perfectly then reuses a handle or posts a receipt with a timestamp. The chain graph goes quiet and the behavioral graph keeps talking. Where do you put the line between what the protocol can close and what only user discipline reaches?