So would you consider the disruption is a feature of the change, and something to be desired?

I'm essentially still asking the first question, whether you believe bip-110 is the best solution for the perceived problem of spam on chain.

Also, I noticed you didn't attach a lightning wallet, which, if you did, I could zap you real sats.

I hesitate to appear frivolous, but I really don't care if a split happens. Disruption is sometimes something that has to be tolerated. Stability at all costs is its own tradeoff.

Mechanic2

A criticism I have heard about bip-110 is that it seems to invite a chain split scenario. This is a potentially chaotic disruption for the network, to my understanding, that might be brought on by the change.

I'd like to know if you believe the temporary soft fork Bip-110 is the best solution for the perceived problem of spam on chain, and if you could imagine a better one, what would it be?

If it is the best solution, then does a chain split worry you? Why or why not?

bitcoin

BIP110 AMA w/Mechanic

Mechanic

A criticism I have heard about bip-110 is that it seems to invite a chain split scenario. This is a potentially chaotic disruption for the network, to my understanding, that might be brought on by the change. 

I'd like to know if you believe the temporary soft fork Bip-110 is the best solution for the perceived problem of spam on chain, and if you could imagine a better one, what would it be? 

If it is the best solution, then does a chain split worry you? Why or why not?