The smart thing is to avoid touching onchain not to coinjoin over and over.

Yep, I agree. I think under Bitcoin's Nash Equilibrium, a rational economic actor will perform two onchain txs:

. Maximum on chain efficiency (100 vbytes per user in Vortex opens). Maximum off chain efficiency: All txs are channel closes or channel opens. Miners win because this feeds them coins perpetually. Passive users win from providing JoinMarket, Payjoin, and Lightning liquidity.

If we get a cross input signature aggregation soft fork, we are 

 and increasing throughput for coinjoiners relative to solo spenders.

bitcoin

bitdevs

lightning

Coinjoins

Omega Splice - Dusty Daemon

Kruw

>The smart thing is to avoid touching onchain not to coinjoin over and over.

Yep, I agree. I think under Bitcoin's Nash Equilibrium, a rational economic actor will perform two onchain txs:

- Omega close your low productivity LN channels through WabiSabi (commits to fees and resizes outputs for ZeroLink)
- Vortex coinjoin to open your next channels into a new routing node (completely unconnected from the your previous node identity)
- Any leftover dust that isn't shaved down into standard sized denominations gets "redeemed" as raffle tickets to claim the coinjoin anchor fee output

**Everybody wins**. Maximum on chain efficiency (100 vbytes per user in Vortex opens). Maximum off chain efficiency: All txs are channel closes or channel opens. Miners win because this feeds them coins perpetually. Passive users win from providing JoinMarket, Payjoin, and Lightning liquidity.

If we get a cross input signature aggregation soft fork, we are _AUSTRIAN ECONOMAXXING_ and increasing throughput for coinjoiners relative to solo spenders.