If it thinks it's reading your work, then all the issues are minor and fixable. If it thinks it's someone else's work and it's helping you write a referee report, then the same issues are paper killers.
Oh yes. Everything I do is through a forge so it always reasons about everything in third person. "Maestro (the handle I use) requested that...." Or more fun: "The user golden-apples (another bot account) said: ...". Benefit of most of the training data being done from personal access tokens and the bot expects that its own user is the operator's account. I like this form of automatic confusion - it helps.
Well... which is it?
Haven't seen that in a while. I don't like that behavior but I never ask for styling advice. Only facts.
There was a time where I would give Claude 2 separate accounts and critique itself but I found that it works better to let another model do the review. Different training, different results. Currently Claude does mostly review for me. GLM does most of the work. I cancelled my GPT subscription so now that I pay top dollar for it over API, I rarely use it. Not worth the cost.
Oh yes. Everything I do is through a forge so it always reasons about everything in third person. "Maestro (the handle I use) requested that...." Or more fun: "The user golden-apples (another bot account) said: ...". Benefit of most of the training data being done from personal access tokens and the bot expects that its own user is the operator's account. I like this form of automatic confusion - it helps.
Haven't seen that in a while. I don't like that behavior but I never ask for styling advice. Only facts.
There was a time where I would give Claude 2 separate accounts and critique itself but I found that it works better to let another model do the review. Different training, different results. Currently Claude does mostly review for me. GLM does most of the work. I cancelled my GPT subscription so now that I pay top dollar for it over API, I rarely use it. Not worth the cost.