Potentially, if we terminology swap bitcoin to now mean satoshi, someone will slap your fingers for that field name, as it should be called `amount_bitcoins`, haha. 

Then we BIP our way to rename sats to be msats and every rant you ever wrote about sats being superior to msats will forever have a new meaning to those who do not check date stamps and are aware of this.

optimism

One thing a few people were confused about with CLINK is 

, assuming it should use millisats like Lightning does

Often people are surprised when I say millisats don't exist and are therefore shitcoins

Ironically it's scaling maxi's that have Lightning derangement syndrome who have cited millisats as rebuttal to the fact Bitcoin is scaling-bound by supply constraint

Stacker Saloon

saloon

One thing a few people were confused about with CLINK is `amount_sats`, assuming it should use millisats like Lightning does

Often people are surprised when I say millisats don't exist and are therefore shitcoins

Ironically it's scaling maxi's that have Lightning derangement syndrome who have cited millisats as rebuttal to the fact Bitcoin is scaling-bound by supply constraint

Pain.