pull down to refresh
Hmm my comment was an antecedent pair followed by a consequent pair. I'm asking if it is so, not arguing that it is so, per se. It's interesting because there's something to be learned here.
I explicitly avoided Paul's AMA because I'm tired of the ever expanding scope of how everything in Bitcoin is wrong and Paul's solution is the only one that can save our poor souls and it solves literally everything from bipcoiners to cashcoiners to fee supply to people getting rekt on other shitcoins to well... the eventual heat death of the universe. I've been hearing that shit for 12 years. Like.. if only we had deployed drivechains then Paul's friend Ver would never have supported BCash and there would have never been a blocksize war. Right? Holy shit bro. We need drivechains tomorrow.
So, I probably made a mistake. Like I said, do whatever you like, no one should be able to stop you.
Uh I don't really care whether you call it a newly formed opinion or not
If my view changes because I hear a good argument or see something interesting, that's fine
If you think that proves your point, then fine
I'm not a reactionary person, I'm not interested in defending an opinion for the sake of consistency
If I end up agreeing with an idea because it makes sense to me, then I do
If that means I embody your point, then so be it
Much love opti, just setting out my stall