pull down to refresh
let me explain, he told me that the content of my post didn't matter because ahh bitcoin. I posted something that said bitcoin doesn't solve every problem and the content of the post is important.
Neither one of you have addressed the content of the post.
Nice rewrite, I never said your other post “didn't matter because ahh bitcoin.” That's @optimism's argument, not mine.
My point is that you told him “don't waste your breath” and “move on,” then apparently found the premise he raised interesting enough to build your next AI post around—just with your own rebuttal attached.
That's actually funnier. Apparently his point wasn't worth engaging with until you needed content.
- I think Bitcoin is a great solution.
- many on here would rather ignore uncomfortable content because in their minds Bitcoin solves everything.
- Bitcoin doesn't not solve everything.
- most people in the country can't afford to stack bitcoin or can't stack enough for it to matter.
That was my post.
give me him credit for what? I said something completely different.
His idea was to ignore the video clip #1548595 and subsequent post. I told him I wouldn't. then used our exchange to write about why I wouldn't.
There it is, you finally admitted it. You dismissed him with “don't waste your breath” and “move on,” then took that exchange, fed it into AI, and turned it into your next post.
Call it a “rebuttal” if that makes you feel better. He still handed you the content you arrogantly told him wasn't worth discussing.
So let me get this straight...@optimism makes the argument, you arrogantly tell him “don’t waste your breath” and “move on,” then a few hours later you AI/recycle the same idea into your own post?
That's impressive. Dismiss the guy, steal the homework, then come back and present it to the class. At least zap him a few sats for writing your next post for you.