pull down to refresh
What's interesting about it...my comment wasn’t addressing your DEI argument. It was addressing you.
@optimism made a point about Bitcoin, encryption, and reducing dependence on political systems. You dismissed him with “don’t waste your breath” and “move on.” Then hours later you AI’d a whole Bitcoin post built around the same premise.
Just calling out the irony isn’t avoiding your content. It’s noticing that apparently an idea becomes worth engaging when your AI gives it back to you.
yeah. like I said. still nothing about the content.
Lol, correct...like I already said. It's because I'm criticizing your behavior for dismissing someone else's argument, then turning it around as your own post/idea. Lame.
understood. I know that content I post is hard for many of you to address head on. I am assuming someone is thinking of a way to defend or deflect it, or maybe some like @coffebadger will step up and own as the agenda.
That's all good. They can mute me. My level of engagement is not a primary concern. My primary concern is to document publicly things I find important or interesting. You still have nothing to say about what I actually posted.
it was obvious. it wasn't a secret.
it was clear what I was doing. But I get it. The actual content gets ignored. The question in my mind, if no one else's, is why?
I find it interesting that none of the comments on this post actually address the content.