pull down to refresh

By Brendan Brown

From the sixteenth century to today, techno-asset inflation is found where monetary inflation and technological revolution interact to produce virulent asset inflation.
The positive supply shock emanating from the technological revolution bears down on goods and services prices. This expands the scope for monetary inflation by impeding an intensification of its symptoms in goods and services markets.

I recall making a similar comment to @SimpleStacker about this recently. Especially in a world of inflation targets, technological advances pushing prices down in one sector must be offset by higher than normal inflation, in order to keep average prices steady or increasing.

pushing prices down in one sector must be offset by higher than normal inflation

Can you explain the must? Simply because of the target? Because they could also just re-bucket, like "inflation sans food and energy" (lol!)

reply

That’s what I meant.

They could switch metrics to avoid the issue but they want the excuse to print more, so I don’t see that happening. They switch metrics when one component is rising too much.

reply

Yeah so it's target+incentive, I guess. Ugh. Why do we put people with debts in charge of inflation (which devalues debt)

reply

Maybe a requisite for people in such positions should be selling off their entire portfolio and just holding piles of cash.

reply

Exactly. Make it hurt! haha

reply
93 sats \ 2 replies \ @satoshiplanet 25 Aug -101 sats

This is the part people miss, if the fed's chasing a fixed inflation target, any deflation from tech gains just gets papered over with more money printing elsewhere to hit the number, so the "stable prices" story hides where the real inflation ends up: stocks, real estate, whatever's not in the CPI basket. Bitcoin's the one asset that can't get quietly inflated to make the math work

deleted by author