pull down to refresh

Here's a legal fight nobody's talking about, and it's stranger than fiction.

In 2020, someone stole 127,271 BTC from a mining pool called LuBian, the largest Bitcoin theft in history. The US government later seized those exact coins, tying them to a Chinese fraud kingpin named Chen Zhi.

But here's where it gets wild.

Now, thousands of terror victims are stepping in, arguing LuBian was actually a front for Iran's Revolutionary Guard. Their claim: the mining pool was laundering Iranian oil money into Bitcoin to dodge US sanctions.

Two separate groups have filed claims:

One group represents victims of Iran-backed attacks over the decades, holding $23.2 billion in court judgments against Iran.

The other represents over 12,000 9/11 victims and families, holding $93.7 billion in judgments against Iran, plus interest.

Their argument: if these Bitcoin are really Iranian state assets, US law lets terror victims seize them to collect on judgments the government itself confirmed years ago.

Even Chen Zhi's own lawyers want the coins back, claiming the US never proved how it got the private keys in the first place.

So now a New York federal court has to decide between three claimants:

The US government, which wants to keep the coins, possibly feeding them into the strategic Bitcoin reserve.

Chen Zhi, who wants his coins back.

And thousands of terror victims, who say this Bitcoin was never his to begin with.

One of the largest government-held Bitcoin stashes in the world. And the ruling could set precedent for how seized crypto gets treated forever.

https://x.com/dailystackhq/status/2092435505782591498?s=46

X links are spam. Reminder to anyone posting an X link, we can not see what you're trying to share. Post a screen shot, get ignored, or stay over there talking to X people

#1555006

reply