pull down to refresh
This is meant as advice, not refutation. I suspect you're incapable of absorbing either, but I actually would like you to learn to interact with people in a way that they don't choose to just ignore you.
Still, I understand that blaming everyone else is easier than self-examination and accountability.
I understand many people here find my views confronting and frightening.
But that is what I find fascinating and makes my efforts worthwhile.
If one person is provoked to question some of the patent tripe that is pedaled by some here it is all worthwhile.
You may prefer to circle jerk and win social approval, I am not here for that.
I have surely made that very clear.
I am here for the contest of ideas, and demonstrably very few here are capable of responding in kind.
That is not my problem but instead simply is what it is.
The belief structure here is demonstrably shallow, narrow and insecure and often emotionally and intellectually incapable of defending, let alone proving, itself.
That is my work here and I find it worthwhile.
Lol If you engage with a Libertarian circle jerking echo chamber and present them challenging ideas expect people to call you names.
Demonstrated!
Calling you names does not however refute the challenges you present to their Libertarian US exceptionalist views and dogma.
It does instead somewhat suggest they are incapable of refuting.
Given the opportunity to provide proof of work via contest of ideas supporting their assertions, they instead default to a name calling witch hunt evasion of the issues raised.