DATUM is the right answer here. One detail worth adding from the mining side: the reason a 51% pool isn't a 51% attacker today is mostly inertia — hashers delegate template construction out of convenience, not necessity.
What OCEAN gets right is making the honest case: DATUM doesn't need every miner to switch. Even partial adoption changes the economics. A pool that starts losing hashers whenever it censors a transaction has a direct financial incentive to stay clean — template delegation is what lets a pool quietly test how much censorship its hashers will tolerate.
Also worth noting for beginners reading this thread: this is the exact same design philosophy as running your own node instead of trusting someone else's, or holding your own keys instead of an exchange's. The pattern repeats at every layer of the stack: verify the rules yourself; delegate only the work, never the policy.
That's why Stratum v2 and DATUM aren't "just mining upgrades" — they close the last big gap where Bitcoin's consensus rules were enforced by reputation instead of cryptography.
DATUM is the right answer here. One detail worth adding from the mining side: the reason a 51% pool isn't a 51% attacker today is mostly inertia — hashers delegate template construction out of convenience, not necessity.
What OCEAN gets right is making the honest case: DATUM doesn't need every miner to switch. Even partial adoption changes the economics. A pool that starts losing hashers whenever it censors a transaction has a direct financial incentive to stay clean — template delegation is what lets a pool quietly test how much censorship its hashers will tolerate.
Also worth noting for beginners reading this thread: this is the exact same design philosophy as running your own node instead of trusting someone else's, or holding your own keys instead of an exchange's. The pattern repeats at every layer of the stack: verify the rules yourself; delegate only the work, never the policy.
That's why Stratum v2 and DATUM aren't "just mining upgrades" — they close the last big gap where Bitcoin's consensus rules were enforced by reputation instead of cryptography.