pull down to refresh
I meant in the sense that this kind of article about data leaks flies under the radar. Only on SN do I see them once in a while. Now, the algorithm is slowly picking up on my interest in them, but before that, I almost never saw them in mainstream media.
EDIT: but i understand the confusion, I've been ranting a few times about LLM generated stuff. I don't mind generally, as long as I can see there is genuine human input/insights before AI slopified it.
Ah! Sorry to have misunderstood!
In my daily life I encounter just about zero people who are at all concerned about privacy. The idea of not wanting to enter an address or phone number is shocking to most people I know.
I don't know how we change that.
The idea of not wanting to enter an address or phone number is shocking to most people I know.
Ditto. Tbf, I was there not long ago. And I'm not actively fighting it yet.
Convenience is a drug.
Such articles as these I often read at a skim. I don't care too much how the author says things, but rather I'm looking for derails in the article. As long as they provide them and links to verify in some way, I'm usually happy.
In this case the article was light on verification links, but i found the first-hand accounts useful.
Why does it bother you of they generated most of the article's text?