pull down to refresh
26 sats \ 1 reply \ @2big2fail 21 Mar 2022 \ parent \ on: Is “Value for Value” fatally flawed? bitcoin
the issue stems from a distinction between tlv record "lightning comments" which are very limited and hacky direct messages to podcasts (like youtube superchats) and the general comment system based on activity pub (mastadon-like). fountain is moving forward with lightning based comments while other platforms are looking for a more general commenting system separate from lightning payments.
it is all the usual "cordial" fighting that occurs with any protocol development while trying to solve a real problem of decentralized commenting and paid messages.
The general activity-based comment system afaict is stuck at the familiar impasse of "it'd be great to have this idealized thing" and "this is so complicated we'll never actually get it done." Fountain's attempt is decentralized enough and works today.
If lightning comments are hack, so are keysends, and the whole v4v streaming thing crumbles anyway.
reply