pull down to refresh
History proves that a dual-asset standard is not confusing. Humanity has always operated on dual systems, whether it was silver and gold, or the dollar and gold. The free market naturally selects the system that protects purchasing power, minimizes cognitive friction, and makes daily pricing effortless.
Bitcoin and Sat successfully protect purchasing power, but Sat fails as an intuitive unit of account for daily pricing. Nah protects that exact same purchasing power while making daily pricing universally legible. People will automatically gravitate toward the unit of account that best fits their cognitive reality.
Furthermore, claiming that a 2.1 quadrillion supply cap (Sat) is less complicated than an 85.3 trillion supply cap (Nah) is a fundamental mathematical error. Most of the global population does not even know what the word "quadrillion" means. Downsizing the cognitive framework from 2.1 quadrillion to 85.3 trillion does not add confusion. It is a necessary simplification that makes absolute scarcity legible to the masses, completing the transition to the Sat & Nah standard.
Not forcing them. They have to do the work. You offering them another token to choose from is just confusing them more.
21 million bitcoins divisible up to 8 decimal places. That's it. Satoshis aren't complicated. They're fractions of a bitcoin.